Educational only — not medical advice. Products sold for research use only. Links marked Shop are affiliate links; “Verified Partner” rows are clearly labeled sponsorships. Neither affects rankings or scores.
Women's Health Recovery Stacks Price Explorer Library The Clarity Score FAQ Spotting Fakes
🛡️ Every price verified within 30 days · every FDA status sourced from FDA.gov

Know what you're really buying — graded, not guessed.

The only peptide guide that gives every compound a transparent Clarity Score for safety & evidence, and keeps FDA-approved drugs and unregulated "research" chemicals in two clearly separated lanes. The real $/mg and the actual science — no hype.

✅ FDA-Approved

Real prescription drugs (Ozempic, Mounjaro, Egrifta, Vyleesi…). The approved version belongs under clinician supervision — so we point you to licensed telehealth, not a gray-market vial.

⚠️ Sold "for research"

Unregulated gray-market chemicals (BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu…) plus a few only in trials. May be impure or mislabeled. We grade them honestly and link the science.

Research use only — no medical, dosing, or efficacy claims. Compounds are unregulated/investigational except where marked FDA-approved; approved drugs are obtained only through licensed telehealth, never a gray-market vial.

Price Explorer

Compare by $/mg — scored and sorted by what it actually is

Pick a goal or a lane. Rows stay grouped into FDA-approved, investigational, and research-only, each carrying its Clarity Score, vendor trust tier, and COA status.

PeptideClarityVendor SizePrice$/mg ▲ vs avgCouponCOAVerifiedGet it

⚙️ Seed data (representative listings, June 2026). Load your full 379-listing dataset into LISTINGS. Shop = affiliate (research only); ✅ approved → licensed telehealth; “Verified Partner” = labeled sponsorship (Gold-tier vendors only).

The Clarity Score — no black box

One transparent grade. Three things you can check.

Every compound gets a 0–100 Clarity Score built from public, verifiable inputs — never a paid placement. Higher = more regulated, better human evidence, and real lab documentation. The score is payment-blind — FDA-approved drugs top it because they're the only regulated, human-trial-backed options, the same reason they're the only lane we route to licensed telehealth. That referral is disclosed and never moves a score.

🏛️

Regulatory status (40)

FDA-approved scores highest; investigational in the middle; unapproved "research only" lowest. Linked to FDA.gov / ClinicalTrials.gov.

🔬

Human evidence (30)

Strong human trials beat mixed/early data, which beat animal-only/preclinical. Linked to PubMed.

🧾

COA availability (30)

Share of listings publishing a batch Certificate of Analysis from a named third-party lab.

Peptide Library

What each one actually is — honestly

Click any card for the full page: Clarity Score breakdown, plain-English overview, evidence grade, legal status, prices & price history for that compound, and the real science. Not medical advice; no dosing.

Stacks · research focus

Peptide "stacks" — what they are & what they're purported to do

A "stack" is several compounds bought and grouped together because sellers and users claim they act along the same pathway. Below is what each is marketed for — not what it's proven to do. None of these combinations are FDA-approved as a stack, none are studied together in humans, and combining unregulated research chemicals multiplies the unknowns. Research use only — education, not medical advice, dosing, or any promise of an effect.

⚠️ Research stack

The "mitochondrial / longevity" stack — MOTS-C + SS-31 + NAD+

The three compounds most often grouped together in cellular-energy research. Tap any one for its Clarity Score, evidence grade and the real science:

What it's purported to do
Sellers and biohacker forums group these for mitochondrial function, cellular energy, metabolism and "healthy aging." The claimed logic: MOTS-C as an "exercise-mimetic," SS-31 to protect mitochondrial membranes, NAD+ as the energy coenzyme. That's marketing and anecdote — the trio has no human trials as a stack.
Reality check
SS-31 is FDA-approved (Forzinity / elamipretide) only for the ultra-rare Barth syndrome — a gray-market "SS-31" vial is not that drug. MOTS-C and NAD+ are research-only with limited human data. Stacking them is unstudied. Verify COAs first ↓

Build it yourself — vendors carrying all three

10 of our 18 tracked vendors stock MOTS-C, SS-31 and NAD+. Lowest in-stock sticker shown for each; vial sizes differ, so this is a shopping list, not a $/mg comparison. ⚑ = unrated, verify COAs.

VendorMOTS-CSS-31NAD+Get it
Ion Peptide G cheapest$42$45$44Shop →
Peptira S best documented$49 10mg$49 10mg$59 500mgShop →
Swiss Chems S$69.95 10mg$41.95$47.95 100mgShop →
Ascension G$65$74.99$135 1000mgShop →
Authentic Aminos $55$65$88Shop →
Northline $84.99$59.99$89.99Shop →
Peptide Warehouse S$105.99$59.99$74.99Shop →
UNYX $59.99$119.99$90Shop →
Atomik Labz S$39$199 50mg$110 1000mgShop →
Nextday S$116.30out of stock$101.65Shop →

Cheapest to assemble: Ion Peptide (~$131, though its NAD+ size isn't listed). Best documented value: Peptira — all three at clean 10 / 10 / 500 mg tiers (~$157) with per-product COAs. The 8 other tracked vendors carry MOTS-C and NAD+ but not SS-31.

Ready-made blends (multiple compounds, one purchase)

Only one vendor pre-mixes MOTS-C and NAD+ in a single vial. The others are themed bundles. No vendor sells all three (MOTS-C + SS-31 + NAD+) in one product.

⚠️ Research blend

NAD+ / MOTS-C / 5-Amino-1MQ Blend

Atomik Labz S · 100 / 10 / 10 mg · $120
Purported: metabolic / fat-loss + cellular-energy research. The only true MOTS-C + NAD+ single-vial combo.
Shop →
⚠️ Research blend

MOTS-C + 5-Amino-1MQ

Modern Aminos S · 10 / 10 mg · $98
Purported: metabolic / fat-loss research (NNMT inhibitor + mitochondrial peptide). No NAD+ or SS-31.
Shop →
⚠️ Research pack

NAD+ + Glutathione Pack

Verified Peptides S · $180
Purported: cellular-energy + antioxidant research. Pairs NAD+ with glutathione; no MOTS-C or SS-31.
Shop →
⚠️ Research bundle

Recovery Bundle: BPC-157 + TB-500 + MOTS-c

Protide Health G · $205
Purported: tissue-repair / recovery bundle that folds in MOTS-c. No SS-31 or NAD+.
Shop →
⚠️ Research blend

Glutathione + NAD+ Nasal Spray

PureRawz · intranasal · $332
Purported: same energy / antioxidant theme in a needle-free intranasal format. Priciest option here.
Shop →

Prices captured 2026-06-26 from public vendor listings and may have changed. Shop links are affiliate links for research-use-only products; we may earn a commission, which never affects a Clarity Score. Nothing here is medical advice, a recommendation, or a dosing protocol.

FAQ

Straight answers

Is BPC-157 FDA-approved?

No. BPC-157 has no FDA approval for human use and is sold only as a research chemical. The FDA has flagged it; most evidence is from animal studies.

Is "research" semaglutide the same as Ozempic/Wegovy?

Same molecule in name only. The approved drug is regulated and pharmacy-dispensed; gray-market "research" semaglutide is unregulated and may be impure or mislabeled. The approved version should be used under clinician supervision — which is why we route you to licensed telehealth.

How is the Clarity Score calculated?

A transparent 0–100: up to 40 for regulatory status, 30 for strength of human evidence, and 30 for the share of listings with a named-lab Certificate of Analysis. The full breakdown is shown on every compound page. Sponsorships never change a score.

What is a COA?

A Certificate of Analysis — a batch lab report showing purity and identity. Strongest = batch-specific, from a named third-party lab, with a chromatogram and a matching lot number.

Are these legal?

Most research peptides are legal to sell and possess for research purposes in the US, but are not FDA-approved for human use and are labeled "for research only."

Spotting Fakes

Green lights and red flags

✅ Green lights

  • Batch-specific COA from a named third-party lab (Janoshik, MZ Biolabs…)
  • COA shows a chromatogram (HPLC/MS), purity %, and a matching lot number
  • Vial size in mg clearly stated, so you can compute $/mg
  • Real contact info + a coherent refund/retest policy

🚩 Red flags

  • A "COA" that's a spreadsheet/screenshot with no lab name
  • A high-mg vial of an expensive active priced below raw-powder cost
  • Purity claims with no chromatogram, or one COA reused for every batch
  • No vial size; lot numbers that don't match